文化研究论文 The Politics Of The Reproducibility
Photography has led to the shift between the original, authentic value of what the viewer is subjected to, to a more modern way of view. The paintings displayed the original view of the items with the same color, creativity and authenticity were also very much a part of the paintings, but with photography most of these aspects are lost in the modernity part. Photography values the exhibition value more than the cult value. The photographs do not evoke the free contemplation that a painting will. They both portray the past events but paintings have the free flowing contemplation and concentration in the viewer compared to a photograph that will carry less of such value. Photography is a reproduction of the paintings and therefore fails to achieve the original basis of paintings. The photographs shape the original political meaning of paintings through randomness storage. Unlike the historical times when the paintings were done according to specific occasions or factors, photography is done at any particular time with little consideration to reasons.
摄影已经导致了原始的，真实的价值的观众受到的转变，以一个更现代的方式。绘画作品中表现出的原始视图具有相同的色彩、创意和真实性也很是绘画的一部分，但随着摄影的这些方面的大部分都在现代性的一部分迷失。摄影价值的展示价值超过了崇拜的价值。这些照片并没有唤起人们对绘画的自由思考。他们都描绘了过去的事件，但绘画有自由流动的沉思和集中在观众相比，一张照片，将携带较少的这样的价值。摄影是绘画的一种再现，因此未能达到绘画的原始基础。这些照片通过随机性存储，塑造了绘画的原始政治意义。不同的历史时期，当绘画是根据特定的场合或因素来做的，摄影是在任何特定的时间，很少考虑的原因。
Photography also presents a distraction with mixed ideas and presents the perception of avoidance of difficult tasks. The works of art will generally capture the most difficult of tasks and will aim at the presentation of the most important factors of an item. Art is able to bring the masses together; it acts to mobilize the people through getting their attention to a particular thing. Photography on the other hand falls below these perceptions and always takes the easiest way of artistic representation. The photographs tend to present a distraction instead of a pull and these shows that the master of the art is just but a habit than really the creativity and talent in it. The public is therefore made as an observer but only absent mindedly without the proper concentration that the works of art expects. The idea is to capture and satisfy the human interest which could simply be the removal of the special function from the field of view. The images of photography therefore leave out a lot of the important details of art meaning the concept of reproducibility leads to the distortion of the original concept.
摄影也提出了一个分心与混合的想法，并提出了避免困难的任务。艺术作品一般会捕捉到最困难的任务，并会在一个项目的最重要的因素的介绍。艺术是能够把群众聚集在一起的，它的行为，动员人们通过把他们的注意力到一个特定的东西。另一方面，摄影低于这些看法，并始终采取最简单的艺术表现方式。照片往往呈现出一种分散的注意力，而不是一种拉拽，这表明，艺术大师只是一种习惯，而不是真正的创造力和人才。公众因此作为一个观察者只是心不在焉地没有艺术作品预计适当浓度。的想法是捕捉和满足人类的兴趣，它可以简单地从视图中删除的特殊功能。摄影的图像因此留下了许多艺术的重要细节，意味着再现性的概念导致了原始概念的扭曲。
The mechanical change noted in the photography means that the reproduction of the works of art leads to the change in the method of exhibition. Photographs simply change the reaction of the public to works of art and change the perception of the works of art. It gives the masses an option of critics. The historical work of arts like the paintings and the portraits were easily accepted by the masses but the photography technology of the modern day has been faced with a lot of critics. For example in Blunden essay, he says that the 19th century disputes to whether photography is a work of art, (part 7). This shows that there is doubt in people at the authentic value of photography in comparison with art. Photography fails to create the subtle effect in the viewers that a simple portrait would. On the other hand, this mechanical production of the works of art is bound to change the public reaction to the particular piece of art, (part 12).
在摄影中指出的机械变化意味着艺术作品的再生产导致了展览方式的变化。照片只是改变公众对艺术作品的反应，改变对艺术作品的感知。它给大众一个批评的选择。艺术如绘画和肖像画的历史艺术很容易被大众接受，但现代的摄影技术却面临着许多的批评。例如在布兰敦的文章，他说，争端的第十九世纪摄影是否是艺术作品，（7）。这表明，人们在与艺术的比较中的真实价值的人有怀疑。摄影未能在观众中创造出一种微妙的效果，一个简单的肖像会。另一方面，这种艺术作品的机械生产必将改变公众对特定艺术作品的反应，（12）。
It can therefore be concluded that the effects of reproduction are adverse to the work of arts. It is quite unfortunate that reproducibility is inevitable especially with the new technologies that come daily with the modern world. The technology is bound to change the works of art and bring a different representation of art. The political significance shifts with every new introduction to the original piece of art. The works of art space and time concept are totally changed in the same manner.
