笛卡尔提出了哲学唯心主义的主要问题，即意识到世界作为一种精神图像与一种外部对象系统的区别。另一方面，洛克的理论包含了精神作为现代的身份和“自我”概念的起源。洛克是第一位通过“意识”的延续来定义自我的哲学家。他还推测大脑是一块“空白的石板”或“白板”。这两种策略与康德的上述策略有很大的不同。在早期现代哲学的开端，在笛卡尔，我们似乎看到了我们熟悉的世界正在消失。然而，在早期现代哲学的鼎盛时期，在康德看来，我们以一定的代价重新回到了我们熟悉的世界。在接下来的文章中，我将讨论这个过程，从笛卡尔开始，到康德结束，并讨论我们这学期所研究的四位哲学家中的两位。在冥想中，笛卡尔给出了三个独立的论点。从这些特定的论点中，我们可以得出这样的结论:我们不能声称对我们周围的世界有任何确定的了解。每件事都可能发生，但在现实中，这并不意味着它缺乏怀疑。如果我们永远无法确定，我们怎么可能知道任何事情。这就是笛卡尔提出这个问题的主要原因。基本上，他的整个论点都是基于怀疑主义。怀疑主义是非常重要的，被看作是我们对世界的认识和理解的一种尝试。我们很难怀疑一个人的存在但我们无法摆脱怀疑主义我们知道的一件事是笛卡尔并不是随机地怀疑一切。他为他所怀疑的事情提供了非常具体的理由。当他建立起这种怀疑时，他必须对此非常理性。如果他不这样做，他的论点就行不通了。
北美留学生paper代写:哲学唯心主义
Descartes presented the main problem of philosophical idealism which was an awareness of the difference between the world as a mental picture and that of a system of external objects. Locke’s theory, on the other hand, encompasses the mind as the origin for modern conceptions of identity and “the self”. Locke was the first philosopher to define the self through a continuation of “consciousness.” He also speculated that the mind was a “blank slate” or “tabula rasa”. These two strategies are very different from the above strategies of Kant.At the beginning of early modern philosophy, in Descartes, we seem to see our familiar world slipping away. At the culmination of early modern philosophy, in Kant, however, we get our familiar world back through at a price. In the following essay I will discuss this process, beginning with Descartes, ending with Kant, and discussing two of the four philosophers we have examined this semester.In Meditation One Descartes gives three separate arguments. From these particular arguments one can conclude that we cannot claim to know with certainty anything about the world around us. Everything might seem probable but in reality that does not mean that it lacks doubt. If we can never be certain how can we know anything. This is the main reason for Descartes bring this issue up.Basically his entire argument is based on Scepticism. Scepticism is very important and is seen as an attempt for our knowledge and understanding of the world. It is really hard to doubt that someone really exists but there is no way that one could get rid of the idea of scepticism The one thing that we know is that Descartes does not just randomly doubt everything. He provides very concrete reasons for the things that he doubts. As he sets up this doubt he has to be very rational about it. If he does not then his argument is not going to work.
