共同努力维护国家培训维护孩子和年轻人应该嵌入在一个更广泛的框架致力于国米和多中心在战略和运营水平支撑共同的目标,规划过程和价值观。儿童法案1989年承认虐待儿童的鉴定和调查,连同受害者及其家人的保护和支持,需要多部门协作。照顾人(DH,1989)表示,成功的合作需要一个清晰的、相互了解彼此的每一个机构的职责和权力,为了使纯应该如何获得和与谁合作。从上面很明显,政府一直积极推动协同工作,这是反映在文学专业。因此,气候政策和立法背景建立了促进跨部门及机构合作。的目的是创造高品质,需要使得、协调服务,最大化选择服务用户(佩恩,1995)。近年来政治压力集中注意力在SW interprofessional协作(波拉德,Sellman和高级,2005),当视为“好thing",它是值得的批判性分析其优缺点有什么好处。
美国俄亥俄州立大学论文代写：协同工作
Working together to safeguard children states that training on safeguarding children and young people should be embedded within a wider framework of commitment to inter and multi-agency working at strategic and operational levels underpinned by shared goals, planning processes and values. The Children Act 1989 recognised that the identification and investigation of child abuse, together with the protection and support of victims and their families, requires multi-agency collaboration. Caring for People (DH, 1989) stated that successful collaboration required a clear, mutual understanding by every agency of each others' responsibilities and powers, in order to make plain how and with whom collaboration should be secured. It is evident from the above that Government has been actively promoting collaborative working, and this is reflected in professional literature. Hence, the policy climate and legislative backdrop were established to facilitate inter-agency and intra-agency collaboration. The stated aim has been to create high quality, needs-led, co-ordinated services that maximised choice for the service user (Payne, 1995). Political pressure in recent years has focused attention on interprofessional collaboration in SW (Pollard, Sellman & Senior, 2005) and when viewed as a "good thing", it is worthwhile to critically examine its benefits and drawbacks just what is so good about it.
