从文章的开始到结尾，她的注意力都是从远离她的人物和人物身上，靠近她周围的人，再到她自己的自我和身份，最后是她自己心灵的内省和私人思想。第一句话提出了一个独立的暴力世界的想法，这是Marian自己的。她着重强调了珀西瓦尔爵士决定保持外部尽管船屋'大到足以容纳我们所有的所以她可能意味着固执在他的行动，或者更可能的是，她可以通过自己的行为感到困惑。用斧头修剪一根棍子的行为带有暴力和男性性的各种含义。这当然是对他时间的任意占有，作为一种毫无意义的、几乎是阴险的方法，使他和他人之间的关系脱节，从而成为混乱的根源。Marian的下一个评论是“我们三个女人”，它将女性团结在一起，作为女性的概念或品质，进一步将她们与珀西瓦尔爵士的独特身份分开。Marian的语言是由思想深刻的遏制。女士们坐在里面，他们很容易适应：“我们三个女人在大座位上找到了足够的空间。”。这句话比较直接对她算一点评论后，谁把凳子许多尺寸太小了，和平衡自己，它靠着小屋的一边，而他的体重–嘎吱作响的句子的小径上长下，更多地参与和尴尬。伯爵和珀西瓦尔爵士的繁琐僵化，反抗和测试物理世界。他们的存在更为明显和难以遏制与谁是兼容的女性，轻微的物理世界里。整个图像是一个稀释的革命世界阉割，野蛮和暴力–容器和女性善良的压迫者。
美国发展研究学essay代写:行为感到困惑
From the start of the passage to the end her attention is drawn from objects and characters far away from her, closer in to those surrounding her, then to her own self and identity, and finally the introspective and private thoughts of her own mind. The first sentence raises the idea of a separate world of violence lying outside Marian’s own. She highlights Sir Percival’s decision to remain ‘outside’ despite the boat-house being ‘large enough to hold us all’ so she could be implying an obstinacy in his actions or perhaps more likely, she may be perplexed by his behaviour. The very action of trimming a stick with a pocket axe carries various connotations with violence and masculine sexuality. It is of course an arbitrary occupation of his time and serves as a meaningless and almost sinister method of disconnection between himself and the others and hence a source of confusion. Marian’s next comment ‘We three women’, at once it unites the women together as a concept or a quality of femininity and further separates them from the singular identity of Sir Percival. Marian’s language is deeply characterised by ideas of containment. The ladies sit inside and they are easily accommodated: ‘we three women found plenty of room on the large seat’. This statement contrasts directly with her comment about the Count a little later, who ‘took a stool many sizes too small for him, and balanced himself on it with his back against the side of the shed, which creaked and groaned under his weight’ – a sentence which trails on for longer, more involved and awkward. The Count and Sir Percival, by their cumbersome inflexibility, rebel against and test the physical world. Their presence is more palpable and harder to contain unlike the women who are compliant, slight and ensconced by the physical world. This whole image is a dilution of the revolutionary world as emasculated, savage and violent – the container and oppressor of feminine goodness.
