为了理解结构性暴力(ii)的概念,它是必要的,作为一个起点,结构主义的概念。反对理性主义(iii),结构主义认为,国家和个人不基于理性的决策。另外,个体既不是完全自由也不影响任何具体成果的能力。相反,“个人是嵌入在影响他们的利益关系结构和交互”[5]。“核辩论”,包括两个韩国国家,提供了一个精彩的例子假设。
两个韩国国家6-25战争爆发以来一直在休息战争的形式。在以后的时代里,两个韩国国家大部分资源集中于建立有效的武器[iv][6]。这些趋势将继续直到最近。然而,朝鲜拥有核能力宣言之后,朝鲜和韩国之间的小冷战面临新的胜利,比赛的终极武器。
美国加州大学洛杉矶分校论文代写：人权的分析
In order to understand the concept of structural violence [ii], it is necessary to take, as a starting point, a structuralism's concept. As oppose to rationalism [iii], structuralism maintains that states and individuals do not make decisions based on rationality. Alternatively, individual agents are neither entirely free nor capable of influencing any specific outcomes. Instead, "individuals are embedded in relational structures that influence their interests and interactions" [5]. A 'nuclear debate', which includes two Korean states, provides a splendid example to the hypothesis.
Two Korean states since the outbreak of 6-25 war have been under the form of 'resting war'. During these later times, two Korean nations focused much of their resources on building effective weapons [iv] [6]. These trends will continue until recently. However, after North Koreans declaration of possessing a nuclear capability, little cold war between North and South Korea faces new triumph; the race for an ultimate weapon.
